Well, this sure has been an interesting week for this campaign.
I wanted to find out if my landing page mocking my target page would convert better than a general landing page design. What I found out wasn’t quite what i expected.
In some cases, it helped, in some cases, it didn’t. 1 target went from negative ROI to 100% positive. Another 2 stayed positive, but ROI dropped about 20%, and 1 just bombed compared to the general landing page. Quite odd if you ask me.
I have some theories behind this:
So was this case study a total waste of time? Absolutely not. I gathered a ton of data. I experimented a lot and gout outside my comfort zone. Using the collected data, I can apply it to future campaigns, and constantly keep analyzing it to see why things went right and why some things turned sour. I know that testing landing page designs is a lot more important than I previously realized. While I always split test for the best results, I now know that perhaps I wasn’t thinking it through far enough.
So now I’m going back on these campaigns to rebuild landing pages and effectively split test them with 2-3 different landing pages, some general, some slighly based off the target, and all very light in size. This is what I have concluded will convert the best for me, although I can’t keep assuming this. It will be effectively split test on all my campaigns from here on out. PPV is a weird beast to tame, and is hardly ever consistent like this.
Get the "Top Secrets to Making Money with PPV" Guide by subscribing here. You'll also get exclusive access to free downloads every Friday and over 700+ images you can use for FB/PoF Dating Ads!!
That's crazy. From the sounds of it, you are only running 4 targets? Or are those just the targets that showed significant change and significant traffic?
Also, the tab order is still buggy on your comment form after the email field.
Thanks for the post Justin!
Was testing the theory with 4 targets. There are about 10 – 20 more that are profitable out of about 500ish (some long tail that got no traffic though).
This is an interesting case study. I find that simply matching the theme (colors) with the target page helps CTR. You don't necessarily need all the graphics in my experiences.
Did you have any issues getting these new LP's by TrafficVance. I have had LP's rejected recently with "TRADEMARK ISSUES" as the reason.
Some LP's used the target's logo. Another, had the logo removed, but it said: "Your FREE widget from Target Name is ready". That one got rejected too.
Do you recommend cloaking or doing a bait and switch?
Cloaking. Def.
Would you care to elaborate cloaking on tvance? I'm assuming you'd use an IP redirect for tvance's admin?
I really like the graphic at the top of the page. :)